Friday, May 29, 2015

Persepolis Film Repsonse

Films and novels are always different no matter what, but I did feel the novel showed more of the issues of the revolution and the Islamic regime in detail then what the film showed. The film showed a bit more of how Marjane grew up, went to Europe, and returned home. It was more a film of Marjane's life without the issues of the revolution or the regime. The film picked the topics or the panels they wanted to show and summarizes other topics or issues by narrating them. The novel showed a better version of Marjane's persona and the dangers of living in Iran and the oppression of the Islamic regime.

3 comments:

  1. Yeah, I also felt the same way about the novel showing more issues of the revolution and Islamic regime. I assumed the film will be like a nonfiction cartoon documentary because of the book. But, it turns out the film leaned more towards humor.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It seemed like Marjane was the center focus of the movie. She was the protagonist, and every scene was somehow involved with her. In the book, there was a lot more narration about other stories. This might be a result of the limited room one finds in a movie versus a novel. You definitely raise some good points, and I agree with them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the movie, Marjane is in the constant spotlight of the film, while on the opposite end of the spectrum, the book highlights and personifies Iran's internal and external conflicts with pictures, and Marjanes perspective. As opposed to the movie, which seemingly only really focuses on events pertaining to Marjane.

    -BG

    ReplyDelete